Science

The Infinitude of Primes

It's like building ever-bigger structures out of LEGO bricks and never running out of the basic kinds of pieces.

  • 3 min read
  • 1 figures
  • Verified 2026-10-17

Definition

A math theorem saying that prime numbers (natural numbers greater than 1 that are divisible only by 1 and themselves) keep appearing forever. No matter how big numbers get, there is no "last prime" that can't be broken down further.

The Basic Blocks That Build Every Number

Picture a box of LEGO bricks. You can snap many bricks together to build a huge castle or a car, but the bricks themselves can't be split into anything smaller.

In math, the numbers that play the role of these basic bricks are prime numbers (numbers whose only divisors are 1 and themselves). Think of 2, 3, 5, and 7. You can make 6 by multiplying 2 and 3, and you can make 12 by multiplying 2, 2, and 3. Every natural number greater than 1 can be broken down into a product of primes.

So as numbers grow past a hundred million, past a trillion, and on forever, do new basic bricks keep showing up? The bigger a number gets, the more likely it is to be divisible by something else, so it looks as if primes might vanish completely one day. But even at the edge of the universe, primes never run out.

Euclid's Clever Twist

About 2,300 years ago, the ancient Greek mathematician Euclid gave a beautifully simple answer to this question. His original proof showed that, no matter which primes you are given, there is always another prime outside that list. Today it is often retold as a proof by contradiction (a method that assumes something false and shows it leads to a contradiction), starting from the assumption that there are only finitely many primes.

Let's suppose the only primes in the world are 2, 3, and 5. Multiply them all together and add 1. (2 × 3 × 5) + 1 gives you 31.

Divide this new number, 31, by 2, and you get a remainder of 1. Divide by 3, and the remainder is 1. Divide by 5, and it's 1 again. So none of the primes we know divides it evenly. That means 31 is either a new prime itself, or it is divisible by some other prime we didn't know about. Either way, we end up with the conclusion that a new prime that wasn't on the list must exist.

A Little More Precisely

Multiplying all the known primes and adding 1 doesn't always give you a prime. To be more precise, even when the result is composite (not prime), it must still have a prime divisor that is new.

For example, multiply the first six primes and add 1: (2 × 3 × 5 × 7 × 11 × 13) + 1 = 30031. This number is not prime. It splits into 59 and 509, which are two new primes. What matters is this: whether the result is prime or not, a prime outside the original list is always needed.

Primes get rarer as numbers grow, but they never disappear completely. Modern encryption such as RSA, used in online banking and more, relies on two facts: there are plenty of very large primes, and it is extremely hard to split the product of two large primes back into its factors.

Common misconceptions

Myth

Following Euclid's method, the number you get by multiplying all known primes and adding 1 is always a prime itself.

Fact

That number isn't necessarily prime. It can be composite, but even then it has a brand-new prime divisor that wasn't on the list, so the proof that there are infinitely many primes still works perfectly.

Where you meet it

  1. Take the primes 2 and 3 and compute (2 × 3) + 1 = 7. A new prime, 7, appears that wasn't on the list.

  2. Internet security encryption (RSA) builds a strong lock by multiplying two enormous primes, each hundreds of digits long.

In one sentence

Primes are the basic building blocks of natural numbers, and no matter how far you go, new primes keep appearing forever.

Created 2025-09-14 Updated 2026-10-17 Verified 2026-10-17